Is it true that Tanium or a partner must configure RBAC controls?

The correct concept regarding Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) in Tanium emphasizes that while RBAC is an important security feature, the responsibility for its configuration isn't necessarily tied to Tanium or a partner. Organizations using Tanium have the flexibility to manage their RBAC controls and can configure them according to their specific needs and security policies. This means that while RBAC must be implemented to enforce access controls, the actual configuration can be handled by the organization's internal teams, giving them autonomy in managing user permissions.

In contrast, the notion that RBAC controls are a mandatory configuration implies a rigid requirement for Tanium or a partner to handle this aspect, which isn't the case. Organizations are encouraged to adopt RBAC to enhance security, but they are not required to rely solely on external entities for its implementation, as that could limit their ability to tailor access controls to their particular environments.